Wednesday, January 7, 2015

A proceeding is adversarial where the party seeking relief has given legal warning to the other party and afforded the latter an opportunity to contest it.





JESSE U. LUCAS vs. JESUS S. LUCAS
G.R. No. 90710, June 6, 2011


“x x x.

To address respondent’s contention that the petition should have been adversarial in form, we further hold that the herein petition to establish filiation was sufficient in form. It was indeed adversarial in nature despite its caption which lacked the name of a defendant, the failure to implead respondent as defendant, and the non-service of summons upon respondent. A proceeding is adversarial where the party seeking relief has given legal warning to the other party and afforded the latter an opportunity to contest it.[1]  In this petition—classified as an action in rem—the notice requirement for an adversarial proceeding was likewise satisfied by the publication of the petition and the giving of notice to the Solicitor General, as directed by the trial court.

X x x.”





[1]               Republic v. Capote, G.R. No. 157043, February 2, 2007, 514 SCRA 76, 85.